Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NorthEast United FC Reserves and Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to NorthEast United FC. RL0919 (talk) 13:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NorthEast United FC Reserves and Academy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable youth team. Its only claim is its WP:INHERITed link to NorthEast United FC Cabayi (talk) 13:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 20:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect too NorthEast United FC. Govvy (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect too NorthEast United FC. Non-notable youth teams. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to NorthEast United FC. Certainly not notable as stand-alone article, but strong connection to the target page. Frank Anchor 16:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: Per WP:RPURPOSE, subject is not inherently notable and should direct to wider, more all-encompassing article. GauchoDude (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.