Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noble College of Pharmacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus that an article does not resist. Since this college is not mentioned in any of the proposed targets, I did not create a redirect. However, this does not preclude adding reliably sourced information to one of the pages (probably Gulbarga or Edu in Karnataka) and creating a redirect in the future. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noble College of Pharmacy[edit]

Noble College of Pharmacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG. HighKing++ 16:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
HighKing, please don't take my words out of context. There is no policy that says 'must'. If users are competent to list articles for deletion, it would not be unreasonable to expect them to know their policies and guidelines especially if they have been granted WP:NPR and read WP:NPP.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kudpung, hang on, you've !voted to Blank and Redirect "per policy". Frankly I am still none the wiser after your response. I'll ask again - can you point to where in policy it states this topic should be blanked and redirected. Notability isn't even borderline for this topic. HighKing++ 15:39, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisWar666 and HighKing: I am absolutely not attached to this article in any way and I don't really care what happens to it, but I am attached to our policies. Like AfC is not an article clean up clinic, neither is it a school for voters. If users are competent to list or comment at articles for deletion, it would not be unreasonable to expect them to know their policies and guidelines. No policy says this article must or should be redirected. Read WP:DELETION and then please discuss elsewhere. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete a private, for-profit pharmacy diploma college (in india, diploma in pharmacy is of 2 years, and degree is of 4 years). If the college was older, I would have agreed with Kudpung, and would have voted for redirect to Gulbarga of Karnataka state. But as the college was established in 2019, it is too young. (The only term starts around Aug-Sept.) As this (for-profit) college fails WP:GNG, and WP:ORG, it should be deleted. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Education in Karnataka.@Kudpung: This is a better target for a redirect.4meter4 (talk) 03:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete without redirect. College was established just this year, and there are no secondary sources out there. I don't see how a redirect to either Karnataka or Gulbarga or Education in Karnataka is appropriate. Those articles don't mention this college, and indeed they wouldn't as they all have a very broad scope. SD0001 (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete without redirect. Even a redirect lends some (albeit limited) credibility to this school, WP:NOTDIRECTORY.--Goldsztajn (talk) 23:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.