Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No-IP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:13, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No-IP[edit]

The article is an advertisement for a non-notable internet services company. No reliable sources have been identified, and no sources other than the company website are used to establish notability. I recommend deletion. In addition, the article was created twice NoIP and No-IP, I redirected one to the other. Rocksanddirt (talk) 18:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Appears barely notable. Powers ^T 19:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well known internet company. Alexa.com statistics indicates some notability [1]. Julius Sahara (talk) 19:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is alexa.com a valid reliable source for internet company notability? I wouldn't think so, as it just tracks hits and links and advertising. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 16:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No-IP is a well known internet company. Over 5 million downloads http://www.download.com/No-IP-DUC-Dynamic-DNS-Update-Client-/3000-2165_4-10375673.html?tag=lst-1. External references have been made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitaldan (talk • contribs)

Of the two external references that relate to the notability of the company, one is only a trivial mention. The remaining references are to either the company website or manufacturers websites for indication that their service is compatible with various internet equipment. Is there any news coverage of the company? --Rocksanddirt (talk) 16:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a fairly well-known service, that much can be said without looking at references or Alexa rankings etc. In any case, I think the references are decent enough. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 08:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.