Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nima Taghavi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Nima Taghavi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Nima Taghavi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NBIO. The article is strung together with press releases and business profiles that merely mention Taghavi, but none provide significant coverage of Taghavi. Notability is not inherited and I couldn't immediately find any sources with in-depth coverage. IceWelder [✉] 10:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Video games. IceWelder [✉] 10:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Iran and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 11:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Delete trivial mentions strung together, nothing terribly out of the ordinary, working business person. Oaktree b (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.