Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Parra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Making a snow closure here, clear community consensus that current and historic members of state/provincial legislatures in federal systems are presumed notable, per WP:NPOL and WP:POLOUTCOMES. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Parra[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being in a state legistlature 10 years ago is not notable. Article has serious issues of NPOV and V that can't easily be remedied. None of the sources are legitimate (ex. Maxim) and the only other real sources are about her endorsing actual notable politicians Colestefan (talk) 15:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree per nom. violation of WP:Notability and extremely lack of sources with WP:Verifiability. WeifengYang (talk) 16:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Presumed notable per WP:NPOL. It may be a coincidence that she announced her candidacy for a Congress seat in 2022 fifteen hours ago. Mccapra (talk) 16:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable per WP:NPOL. Arsonxists (talk) 17:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is every single California state legislator in history automatically entitled to a Wikipedia page? There does not appear to be anything else notable about Nicole either during her time in the legislature or since. It's clear this article is shambolic in terms of its content and sources. Colestefan (talk) 17:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In answer to your first sentence, yes, per WP:NPOL, which I linked before you even started this discussion. If the current sourcing in the article is inadequate then WP:SOFIXIT applies. You could start by looking at the sources found by clicking on "books" and "news" above. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article has a couple of things that could use improvement, but the subject is notable. ―NK1406 ^{talk•contribs} 17:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Former member of the California State Assembly. Passed WP:NPOL --Enos733 (talk) 18:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the whole point of WP:NPOL is that we have complete coverage of important political offices. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 18:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The sourcing in the article is bad, but it's easy to find coverage of her elections and her work in the legislature. I added an article about her endorsement by the CA Farm Bureau. — Toughpigs (talk) 18:49, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I cleaned up some of the sourcing, but still borderline. WP:NPOl doesn’t automatically justify an article for every historic legislator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:140:B:7DE:2C46:202A:E81B:4081 (talk) 19:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
speedy keep state legislators are notable and this has lots of historic precedent, no case for deletion. Article has issues but nothing that can't be fixed. Kingofthedead (talk) 01:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.