Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Mitchell Murphy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Mitchell Murphy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These just get worse and worse. Based upon my research in trying to find evidence that she modeled for "Chanel, Valentino, Yves St. Laurent [sic], Ungaro, and more."–anything to improve this article that does nothing but advertise and mention that she was married to Eddie Murphy 50 times–it's evident that some lazy bogan literally just copied and pasted practically this whole "article" from an unreliable forum called solarey.net. I'm not shocked, but I expected more originality in the plagiarism. Outside of all that, what it comes down to is she's not independently notable and there seems to be no actual verification of her career endeavors. Even today, this very day, it's "Nicole Murphy who was to Eddie Murphy with whom she has 5 kids and was engaged to Michael Strahan was spotted kissing Antoine Fuqua." The reach has to end. Trillfendi (talk) 22:54, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. She seems to have some kind of business in Los Angeles, California, but she's not Notable enough for that, or for anything else. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT, WP:NOTINHERITED, and WP:COPYVIO. She might be notable, but this plagiarized piece isn't an article. Bearian (talk) 13:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.