Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Brune

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:49, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Brune[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did a WP:BEFORE and didn't find any sigcov for this after @Darklordofpinup: pointed out the lack of notability. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Women. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Googling leads to only social media. Adler3 (talk) 03:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm not clear as to the reason for this or what needs to be done, but I'm happy to make any needed adjustments. If I'm understanding this, 'darklordofpinup' said this needs to be done? That name being attached to this issue raises red flags as to the legitimacy of the complaint. I'm very aware of who is attached to that name and they have a tendency to show up every few years to verbally assault Nicole's carreer until they find a new distraction and show up again years later. They were recently blocked on instagram due to harrasment.

What is a "sigcov"

thanks for the help! Elcack (talk) 21:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Sigcov" is an abbreviation of "significant coverage", and it's one of the requirement for a citation source to be seen as adequate. You can read more about it in WP:GNG. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Poorly composed article, which relies exclusively on trivial mentions and non-independent sites (like link to purchase product from the subject). Searching online, I only found more trivial mentions, promotional pieces, and one coverage about a horse racer with the same name. Seems like a WP:PROMO to me. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am not finding any reliable sources for this comic book artist. No way to bring this up to notable. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This promotional entry on a non-notable artist Fails WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST, WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. I removed the "source" that was a bare url link to an advertorial sales site. The article is poorly formatted and the current sourcing consists of one trivial mention, one does not mention her at all, and two are photo caption mentions. Netherzone (talk) 15:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.