Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas F. Frichot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 00:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas F. Frichot[edit]

Nicolas F. Frichot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Frichot is not notable as a politician or political consultant, nor as an athlete. If the National Slam Poetry contest of Mauritius is a notable thing, this title might be a valid redirect, but otherwise, it jus needs to be deleted as shameless self-promotion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • G7 is only for cases where there are no other authors than the article creator. In addition, I think it is better to have this AfD run its course, so that any future re-creations can summarily be dealt with under G4. --Randykitty (talk) 12:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No WP:RS establish WP:GNG. This article may also have been a good candidate for db-spam. --Jersey92 (talk) 01:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - a blatant piece of self promotion as I have ever seen. For policy infringements see those cited above by other voters. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.