Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Fury (Ultimate Marvel character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Nick Fury#Ultimate Marvel. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Fury (Ultimate Marvel character)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The character Nick Fury is surely notable; but this particular alternative version of Nick Fury does not seem to be. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Nick Fury#Ultimate Marvel, the WP:SS parent. In general, I believe it's better to cover multiple versions of one character in one article. Jclemens (talk) 03:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Nick Fury#Ultimate Marvel - I'd say the fact that the Ultimate Marvel depiction of Fury has become the most widely used look for the character due to it being the basis of the MCU version gives it a tad more notability than most "alternate" versions of characters, but I agree that it would be better covered as part of the main Nick Fury article. Rorshacma (talk) 06:06, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable version of the character, easily passes GNG.★Trekker (talk) 08:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you point to some of the sources that help this version of the character pass GNG? Josh Milburn (talk) 08:49, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do better than asserting WP:ITSNOTABLE _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Nick Fury#Ultimate Marvel. The character itself is not notable, but some information written in the article could be covered in the Nick Fury article. Redjedi23 (talk) 10:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the claims that were made by @StarTrekker: or merge with Nick Fury#Ultimate Marvel in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. --Rtkat3 (talk) 17:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The character doesn't have enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. There is a good WP:ATD that would improve readability and avoid any WP:SIGCOV problems. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. The proliferation of Marvel character variants is puzzling to me, and likely, 99% of readers who are non die hard fans. Nick Fury is notable and deserves a page on Wikipedia. One page. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.