Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nichola$ KM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. clear consensus that it meets the standard for A7 DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nichola$ KM[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable/WP:TOOSOON singer with no coverage in any WP:RS. JamesG5 (talk) 05:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The comparison with Ke$ha aside, AllMusic.com and iheart.com are not suitable evidence of notability. Neither is a reference to a high school's web page, nor is the assertion that he is a "future writer". Once he has become notable, we can have an article on him. Nothing here demonstrates that, and as a Google search conveniently turns up only one result— this very Wikipedia article— I only find myself wondering why this didn't get yanked as a CSD under A7. KDS4444 (talk) 05:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing notable about this person. It appears that the A7 was accidentally pulled due to an edit conflict. Both notability and tone issues, Robert McClenon (talk) 06:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Like Robert McClenon said, there's nothing seemingly notable about this person (yet). It's written like an advert and there's a clear conflict of interest. ɯɐɔ (talk) 06:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons ably given above. -- Hoary (talk) 07:01, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete CSD(A7) - Once again, repeated deletion of a CSD template by a page creator has led us here. No reliable sources, all self-published or don't even mention the subject of the article. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.