Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newington railway station, Sydney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow delete, yes it's early but these could have been bundled and as the main AfD makes clear, this is the consenus for these stations. No prejudice against re-creation when/if these stations become a reality or begin construction.. TravellingCari 14:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newington railway station, Sydney[edit]

States no sources, nothing found online nor on the New South Wales Governement site. Non-existent station. There are no official nor any other sources indicating that such station is even proposed or planned for construction. Pikablu0530 (talk) 01:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- this article contains very little actual content (massive amounts of question marks don't count), and all ghits for "Newington Railway Station" I can find are about unrelated stations in Britain. Reyk _YO! 01:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a proposed future station on a railway line that is as yet a concept only. The article fails the notability guidelines requiring non-trivial coverage in relibale secondary sources. There is also an element of the crystal-ball here - an overused argument in deletion discussions but relevant in this case. This article would be justifed only when funding has been found for the Metro, its route determined and actual planning for station locations commenced. Euryalus (talk) 03:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete all - I'm in favour of keeping railway stations, but this is just pure speculation. Whether the line will even be built, let alone its route, is still up in the air. It is not like the North West Metro which is much more planned and the stations are almost definite if the line proposal goes ahead. These should be deleted and the user censored - I believe they are working on an unregistered user name and adding spurious additions like this elsewhere - I have had to clean a lot of it up lately. JRG (talk) 13:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.