Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netball in Brunei
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 02:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Netball in Brunei[edit]
- Netball in Brunei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has barely any content, and the governing body of the sport does not even recognize the country. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 02:25, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Virtually little content. What else do we know about netball in Brunei other than the fact that it's available to girls PE classes? And what the heck does badminton have to do with netball? ZappaOMati 03:03, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – possibly merge with Netball. No valid rationale for deletion has been presented in the nomination, per WP:DEL-REASON. This topic meets WP:GNG per [1], [2], [3], [4]. Also, an article having little content is not a valid reason to delete it in entirety. If this were the case, then all stub articles would be removed, which wouldn't be functional whatsoever. See also: WP:NOEFFORT. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Gongshow Talk 04:36, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brunei-related deletion discussions. Gongshow Talk 04:36, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Topic clearly meets WP:GNG. Being a stub is not a valid rationale for deletion. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Extremely limited information, true, but no reason is presented to remove the little information we have. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.