Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Connell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:NSPORT, unreferenced. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Prod removed by creator. MuffledThud (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, fails WP:ATHLETE. Angryapathy (talk) 14:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:ATHLETE. Warrah (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:43, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. By the level of detail and the "We anticipate his arrival on the adult international scene with excitement", it looks like an attempt to promote someone the author knows/is, Lord Spongefrog, (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!) 19:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.