Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasrul Eam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nasrul Eam[edit]

A photographer who has published a single e-book (PDF, $9.99) that has got a review and has got him an interview at a single website that's arguably of note. He does seem promising, and I do realize that prospects for publication of actual dead-trees photo books, the staging of one-man exhibitions, etc., are likely to be tough for the Bangladesh-based photographer; still, if he's said to be "uprising" [a new variant on "emerging", I suppose] then let's wait till he has uprisen a little further before giving him an article so rich with links to purchasing options. -- Hoary (talk) 00:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating

-- an article on the Ebook -- for deletion. Hoary (talk) 00:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 00:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 01:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - While I agree it's hard for someone like him to achieve notability, he just isn't there yet. He doesn't appear in enough reviews and isn't in any news sources or books. DARTH PANDA ^duel 01:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - completely fails any test of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If anyone present more third party sources (a notable award), I change my opinion. Zero Kitsune (talk) 03:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Different opinion- I read that book; I prefer the book should stay in Wikipedia. The book changed my understanding about that country Bangladesh, and I will visit Bangladesh and Sidr effected area next year. Elezabet
- — Elezabet (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete--whatever the book may have done for this or that person, the subject is not notable enough, and good god almighty, this article is the most blatant advertising I've seen on WP in weeks. In fact, I removed a few sentences from the lead, because it was just too much. Drmies (talk) 05:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Different opinion - I do agree, about that person it was too much before, but it is a fact that the book is completely different type, I knew south Asia differently before. As Hoary said -he is still emerging or uprising, so we need to wait and see. I am still waiting to hear lot more from its readers, because I reckon, reader will mark it in a different way, as I am one of them. Elezabet 06:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Elezabet, please sign your messages with four consecutive taps on the "~" key: this adds your signature and date. Thanks. -- Hoary (talk) 12:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no soruces to establish notability. A single interview isn't sufficient. -- Whpq (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N, WP:V. --Ragib (talk) 05:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.