Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Wakabayashi

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~~ OxonAlex - talk 14:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naomi Wakabayashi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Naomi Wakabayashi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not known for any significant roles other than Ritsuko Akizuki from Idolmaster and Kud and Little Busters. Sk8erPrince (talk) 18:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. No need for WP:NACTOR. This person satisfies WP:NMUSIC 2 and 10. Her iDOLM@STER character's three albums and one single (all four solo) charted at 10, 19, 20, and 34. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I've skimmed the Japanese article and found out that she is no doubt notable since she only had a significant role in the anime The Twelve Kingdoms.--RekishiEJ (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - there is only one reference in the article and that is to Wakabayashi's own blog - does not meet WP:BASIC; no significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources - Epinoia (talk) 03:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per results from the Japanese wiki. Govvy (talk) 22:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- Dream Focus 11:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep WP:NACTOR clearly states: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Multiple means two or more, as clearly defined in the dictionary. Since the nominator admits they have two significant roles, I see no reason for this AFD. Dream Focus 11:37, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Statements appear to be reliably sourced. Barca (talk) 19:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per results from the Japanese wiki. - MA Javadi (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
How is it related? The only thing these two have in common is their occupation. I don't think you're allowed to WP:CANVASS other editors like this.... --Sk8erPrince (talk) 22:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is not canvassing to try to get more people to participate in an AFD which for some reason got overlooked by most. They may be familiar with the roles in the series the person has been in, or have other information about them. Dream Focus 22:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Each AFD is different, and independent of each other. I disagree with your assessment that the Ichikawa AFD is in any way related. I just happened to have nommed that for deletion as well. There is no real correlation, and not to mention, I have never seen anyone attempt to call attention to another AFD in an AFD discussion. Heck, I am not even sure if you're even *allowed* to do that (I have a feeling that it's not). --Sk8erPrince (talk) 23:00, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Their articles look about the same to me. Both have a very brief bit of information about them at the top, and then the article lists all their roles. And I've seen this done many times before, it is allowed between similar articles. Dream Focus 23:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment AfD is not cleanup. As written, the article clearly fails WP:NBIO and various NACTOR. There is no indication that any of her roles (mostly, voice) where for major characters. No indication she has any fans, got covered in press, etc. FoxyGrampa75 mentions music involvement but it is not discussed in the article at all. As far as I know, idolmaster is a large group, so it's not like they were solo works, through this wikia page suggests there is a lot of related products. There's some minor celeb coverage in anime-fandom [1]. This probably needs fixing, rather than deletion, through I think her notability is more related to passing NMUSIC than NACTOR. I'd appreciate if someone else familiar with NMUSIC could confirm she passes based on this criteria; please ping me if there is more discussion on that. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. passes WP:NACTOR #1 and passes WP:NMUSIC #s 2 and 10. Lightburst (talk) 22:49, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - meets basic notability criteria per Lightburst and Piotrus --DannyS712 (talk) 05:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:NMUSIC and WP:NACTOR.4meter4 (talk) 11:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Naomi_Wakabayashi&oldid=917365599"