Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadeem Askar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nadeem Askar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The only web sources I could find are mostly focussed on this movement PTM. I cant find many reliable sources that are independent of this subject. The coverage that exists for this person consist mostly of routine coverage of the movement and a few articles regarding his arrest. But certainly "significant coverage" does not exist, which is a key requirement in meeting WP:GNG Kami2018 (talk) 16:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Kami2018 (talk) 16:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:POLITICIAN because he is considered a leader of the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement and also associated with at least two other political parties: Awami National Party and Muttahida Tulaba Mahaz. He is a notable local political figure from the town of Janikhel in Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and has received a relatively significant press coverage in English, Pashto, and Urdu language sources. Khestwol (talk) 18:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with Pashtun Tahafuz Movement. He lacks the sources to be notable and WP:POLITICIAN doesn't count in this case because the leader of a "movement" isn't a political position. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. -Hatchens (talk) 03:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per @Adamant1: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ytpks896 (talk • contribs) 09:00, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 21:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the subject is covered by the news media, but with "trival mentions". No independent source(s) found. At present, it doesn't pass general notability guideline. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I do not see evidence that the subject is notable; the coverage in the sources provided is trivial, meaning they do not meet GNG, and leading a political party is insufficient for meeting NPOL; that requires either holding elected office, or having substantive press coverage. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since subject is not notable enough for an independent, stand-alone article. Otherwise, Merge to the article on the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement, of which he is a promiment member, per sources. A case of WP:TOOSOON, possibly. -The Gnome (talk) 08:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.