Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Na Zare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Na Zare[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails wp:sigcov and WP:SINGLE . Dtt1^Talk 21:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Dtt1^Talk 21:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Dtt1^Talk 21:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Kadzi   (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

23:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has been modified since nomination so that it's not just a machine translation of the Russian version and more sources have been added. I think the song has been written about enough in Russian-language sources for wp:sigcov to apply, and it has also been covered by a few notable artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballerlikemahler (talk • contribs) 15:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Remove and redirect to Alyans (band) on the basis that the article fails WP:SINGLE. The sources might be there but there is not enough detail to warrant a separate article in its current state. lovkal (talk) 16:10, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article has plenty of sources and details about this song. --ShadZ01 (talk) 18:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per WP:HEY. Article is good enough to pass WP:NSONG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 05:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the article has beedn modified so it is good now Alex-h (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article has been improved, now meets GNG. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 20:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Article has been improved and squeeks past WP:GNG / WP:NSONG. // Timothy :: talk 04:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.