Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyOtaku
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
MyOtaku[edit]
non-notable wapanese blog site. 46 unique google hits. timecop 04:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 05:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Borderline speedy. MER-C 06:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Non-notable blogging service. Seems like advertising. –- kungming·2 (Talk) 06:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Tiifm 06:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 11:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, might even be a speedy. — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 11:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete clearly fails WP:WEB and no real assertion of notability. Eusebeus 14:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable, advertising, vanity. - Femmina 20:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'd hardly consider 460,000+ members, and the only anime-centric blog service to be non-notable. - Baron.LSN 13:30 29 November 2006 (GMT +8)
- Delete - "wapanese" is not politically correct, the right term is "weeaboo" :) --Wooty Woot? contribs 21:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Someone else pointed that to me on irc as well. Sorry, I'm not up to date on current Japano/animu/scatphilia. :P --timecop 03:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply - It was a joke, and the guy on IRC was probably pulling your chain as well =p. Both are sort of detrimental terms, I was just joking about how there's two words for the exact same thing with the exact same connotations. "wapanese" is used more in mainstream usage, with places like 4chan and Something Awful preferring the "weeaboo" term. They're both hilarious words. --Wooty Woot? contribs 07:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - reads like an advertisement. All references are from the site itself. MightyAtom 06:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I sound like a broken record, but most web sites on wikipedia fail WP:V and WP:RS. This one fails even WP:WEB. --Quirex 00:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.