User contributions for Dark Shikari
Appearance
Results for Dark Shikari talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 5,751 edits. Account created on 10 November 2004.
6 April 2008
- 22:1122:11, 6 April 2008 diff hist −51 Smoked cheese Undid revision 203758691 by 77.249.176.232 (talk)
- 00:5300:53, 6 April 2008 diff hist +698 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical elements in popular culture (2nd nomination) No edit summary
- 00:1100:11, 6 April 2008 diff hist +572 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical elements in popular culture (2nd nomination) No edit summary
20 March 2008
- 22:5922:59, 20 March 2008 diff hist +4 X264 →Capabilities: adding newer options
14 March 2008
18 February 2008
- 23:2123:21, 18 February 2008 diff hist −1 m Advanced Video Coding <oops, cut off my edit summary> Elecard's film grain optimization is NOT FGM. FGM is not supported by any existing encoder or decoder, including the reference.
- 23:1923:19, 18 February 2008 diff hist −1 Advanced Video Coding Elecard's film grain optimization is NOT
- 10:2410:24, 18 February 2008 diff hist +278 Talk:Eve Online →Why a source within the EVE Aurora forums in not appropriate
- 10:2310:23, 18 February 2008 diff hist −312 Eve Online If no conclusion was reached, why are you still inserting content that violates the verifiability guidelines? Reverted, again.
17 February 2008
- 08:4508:45, 17 February 2008 diff hist +76,245 User talk:The Evil Spartan rvv
- 01:2501:25, 17 February 2008 diff hist +3 Azumanga Daioh rvv last of vandalism
- 01:2401:24, 17 February 2008 diff hist +113 Azumanga Daioh rvv
15 February 2008
- 00:1700:17, 15 February 2008 diff hist −313 Eve Online rvv, unsourced speculation
14 February 2008
- 02:0302:03, 14 February 2008 diff hist +52 Battletoads Undid revision 191284430 by 65.191.26.160 (talk)
12 February 2008
- 18:0818:08, 12 February 2008 diff hist −356 Battletoads Undid revision 190922620 by 198.203.175.175 (talk)
- 08:3608:36, 12 February 2008 diff hist +565 User talk:Dark Shikari →Combined Comunity Codec Pack / AVG
- 00:1500:15, 12 February 2008 diff hist +561 User talk:Dark Shikari →Combined Comunity Codec Pack / AVG
11 February 2008
- 19:5819:58, 11 February 2008 diff hist −295 Combined Community Codec Pack Again, AVG is reporting a false positive. Please do not include unsourced defamatory statements in articles.
- 03:0503:05, 11 February 2008 diff hist −21 Marian Wright Edelman fix error in formatting
10 February 2008
- 23:2323:23, 10 February 2008 diff hist −333 Talk:Battletoads rvv 4chna trolling
- 23:1323:13, 10 February 2008 diff hist −295 Combined Community Codec Pack AVG has a tendency to report false positives. Removed for lack of sources.
- 20:5120:51, 10 February 2008 diff hist 0 Steel Undid revision 190449872 by 70.174.76.173 (talk)
- 09:3909:39, 10 February 2008 diff hist −312 Eve Online The job of Wikipedia isn't to report to the truth; its purpose is to report what is attributable and verifiable.
- 07:3807:38, 10 February 2008 diff hist +514 Talk:Eve Online →Why a source within the EVE Aurora forums in not appropriate
8 February 2008
- 03:4603:46, 8 February 2008 diff hist −312 Eve Online "There are no reliable sources, therefore this forum is a reliable source for these allegations" is not a valid argument.
7 February 2008
- 02:5702:57, 7 February 2008 diff hist −15 Battletoads Undid revision 189653643 by Eleven Special (talk)
6 February 2008
- 17:3117:31, 6 February 2008 diff hist −232 Eve Online Reverted--cruiser skill does not and has never required destroyer skill (it requires racial Frigate level 4 only).
- 17:0717:07, 6 February 2008 diff hist +388 Talk:Eve Online →Why a source within the EVE Aurora forums in not appropriate
- 17:0517:05, 6 February 2008 diff hist −281 Eve Online Again, such extreme allegations cannot be verified with a source on a private forum. Find an acceptable source, or remove the allegations.
3 February 2008
- 01:1801:18, 3 February 2008 diff hist −947 Eve Online Again, forums are not valid references for these sort of allegations. Its much the same logic as BLP; allegations such as these require solid references.
2 February 2008
- 06:0106:01, 2 February 2008 diff hist −443 Eve Online It doesn't matter *who* said it--a statement on a private forum is not a reliable source for such an allegation.
28 January 2008
- 22:4722:47, 28 January 2008 diff hist −33 Battletoads Undid revision 187562398 by 90.202.16.229 (talk)
27 January 2008
- 09:0109:01, 27 January 2008 diff hist −44 Battletoads Undid revision 187205459 by 71.223.149.125 (talk)
21 January 2008
- 09:5009:50, 21 January 2008 diff hist −1,204 Eve Online If they look kosher to you, why not explain why on the talk page instead of blanket reverting the existing consensus?
20 January 2008
- 06:3806:38, 20 January 2008 diff hist +354 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Toxicmango
- 06:3606:36, 20 January 2008 diff hist +422 User talk:Toxicmango →3RR: new section
- 06:3406:34, 20 January 2008 diff hist +476 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Toxicmango at EVE Online: formatting
- 06:3206:32, 20 January 2008 diff hist +1,133 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →Violations
- 05:5405:54, 20 January 2008 diff hist −1,204 Eve Online Again, there is consensus against you on the talk page. If you disagree, discuss it, don't blanket revert.
- 05:0905:09, 20 January 2008 diff hist −1,204 Eve Online You will keep being reverted until you discuss on the talk page. This is not optional.
- 01:4401:44, 20 January 2008 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Toxicmango
- 01:4001:40, 20 January 2008 diff hist +858 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Toxicmango: new section
- 01:3701:37, 20 January 2008 diff hist −1,204 Eve Online Discuss on the talk page. The way to deal with an objection is not to revert it without answering their complaint.
17 January 2008
- 23:2023:20, 17 January 2008 diff hist −52 Eve Online Saying something is "disputed" without giving a valid source is weasel wording. Its much like saying "Some people think that..."
14 January 2008
- 02:2102:21, 14 January 2008 diff hist −510 Eve Online The source you have cited does NOT do anything except state the allegations; it does not state that the allegations were true. If you want to debate this, take it to the talk page.
13 January 2008
- 05:3605:36, 13 January 2008 diff hist +353 User talk:Dark Shikari →EVE Online
12 January 2008
- 22:0622:06, 12 January 2008 diff hist +536 User talk:Dark Shikari →EVE Online
- 22:0522:05, 12 January 2008 diff hist +396 User talk:Dark Shikari →EVE Online
- 21:0321:03, 12 January 2008 diff hist +627 User talk:Toxicmango →Vandalism at EVE Online: new section
- 20:5920:59, 12 January 2008 diff hist −510 Eve Online rvv vandalism