Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munzihirwa Centre, Kinshasa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 18:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Munzihirwa Centre, Kinshasa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, promo The Banner talk 11:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Enough substantial independent sources to satisfy GNG turn up with searches on French name. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 00:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I see a total of 38 hits on Google, 1 on Google News and 0 (zero) at Google scholar. The Banner talk 18:49, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Counting the g-hits is less likely to be fruitful than considering the relevance and reliability of the sources they reveal (a doctoral thesis, a report by an international body, a Cambridge University Press reference work, and so forth). If you're not comfortable with French, just take our word for it. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - I am comfortable enough with my French, but I am also comfortable with WP:RS, independent sourcing and dead links. The Banner talk 22:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has reliable French book sources coverage, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:55, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you mind to show that? The Banner talk 18:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:49, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.