Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munyankindi Francois

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Munyankindi Francois[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded with the following rationale: "contest WP:PROD deletion - mayor of cities or districts with a population of 300000+ usually turn out to be notable, so this shouldn't be deleted without discussion."

However, this particular mayor does not appear to pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO, and he certainly doesn't pass WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case there happens to be anyone commenting here who believes in looking for sources before giving an opinion I note that the name order in the article title is reversed. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note to AfD closer: The page under discussion has been moved to Francois Munyankindi (different name order). EdJohnston (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~To correct the de-prodding: I think he was the mayor of a city with a population of 30,000 people (source).~~ Zero hits in Newsbank or LexisNexis searches. The sources appear to be: The New Times source cited, a self-published book about soy, this Africa Intelligence piece, and there are 8 other hits in the New Times, but only two can be said to be substantive content about Francois Munyankindi (note: most of those sources identify him as district mayor. But not all do--noticably so, but would not be surprised if UNHABITAT source I used above is wrong). Will be following discussion and can change, but based on these sources, I think delete is appropriate. ~~Final: Even if we ascertain that he was the district mayor, the sources found do not pass GNG for me (nor NPOL).~~ Add: Appears most likely he is district mayor, but that still doesn't pass GNG or NPOL. AbstractIllusions (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- A7 material and no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.