Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Is'ad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Athaenara (talk · contribs) (WP:CSD#G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: more at User talk:Muhammad Is'ad)

Muhammad Is'ad[edit]

Muhammad Is'ad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography of completely non-notable student. Speedy tag removed by obvious sockpuppet, hence the AFD. Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete/Speedy – per nom, completely non-notable autobio.--☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 14:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as there is no proper claim, never mind proof, of notability. Also, block the sock and either block the sockmaster or put him on final warning. I do sometimes feel a bit sorry for tagging clueless autobiographies for deletion as it can be a big knock to the authors' egos, and a lot of them are just kids who have grown up in a world where it seems that one can become famous merely by asserting that one is famous loudly, but my sympathy for this guy evaporated when the sockpuppetry started. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable at the moment, maybe someday but not today. Bryce Carmony (talk) 15:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable autobiography. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I unblanked the article, per AfD instructions. It is still CSD tagged though, for self-deletion.--☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 16:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.