Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morning Star High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 17:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Star High School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT). Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage. Sources in the article are not IS RS or are directory listings. BEFORE revealed nothing with SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 20:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 20:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 20:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article about a school failing GNG and relevant subjective criteria like WP:NORG. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^{^(talk)} 22:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - very surprised that the PROD was removed. Clear WP:GNG and WP:NORG failure and has zero coverage in reliable sources Spiderone 11:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly PROD is a completely broken process. // Timothy :: talk 11:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also worth keeping an eye on the article as I've noticed that the creator has been removing the AfD repeatedly (he's now on strike 3) Spiderone 17:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Article lacks reliable sources, fails WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The lack of notability is the most notable thing about this place. GenQuest ^"scribble" 08:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't delete this article. If you want tgen improve it but don't delete it for god sake. Jogesh 69 (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Jogesh69[reply]

If sources exist that would allow us to improve the article and show that it is a notable organisation then please post them here Spiderone 11:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will post each and every sources I can find. I request you to review them and then take decision on their basis. Jogesh 69 (talk) 13:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Jogesh 69[reply]

Jogesh 69 - have you found any sources? Spiderone 10:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.