Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moody Middle School (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moody Middle School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT). Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage in local news, the type all secondary schools would receive in local news. BEFORE revealed nothing that meets SIGCOV. There is no sourced content to merge; it could be redirected to School District 43 Coquitlam if there is consensus. This is a nice, normal, school, with local news coverage, not an encyclopedic topic. Previous AfDs from 2005 and 2006. // Timothy :: talk 17:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 17:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 17:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 17:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Comparing this with other secondary schools in School District 43 Coquitlam, this is a stub that we must keep. It may be called a middle school- but it once was a high school which colours the decision. A school realignment and a fire means that significant covefrage will exist even if the previous editor didn't understand the importance of including the references. Gleneagle Secondary School (now a upper high) has found over 20 refs.ClemRutter (talk) 15:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we need really good sourcing to justify an article on something that is covering below grade 9, and we do not have that level of sourcing here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lackluster sourcing. The only thing I see going for this is the fire mentioned by ClemRutter, but whatever coverage there is of it likely is local and it basing the article on that alone would go against audience and NOTNEWS anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:25, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claims in the article that make it notable, nothing found to support notability Jeepday (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Port_Moody#Education; even former high schools are no longer automatically notable, so we don't have to keep it. Bearian (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.