Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonteCristo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MonteCristo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural renomination because of Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 August 2; I did assess that the consensus was to allow a recreation with an AfD discussion including the new sources that weren't present in the prior deletion discussions. I have no opinion on the merits of this article - one sensible suggestion though would be to assess the merits of the article without considering its history. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't know the history of the article but it seems to pass WP:NPERSON to me. shoy (reactions) 13:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources include:
- A Daily Dot article that is solely about the subject.
- A PCgamer article covering an ownership scandal involving the subject.
- An ESPN article that covers three peoples' dispute about pay for being a broadcaster including the subject of the article.
- Judge bio for esports industry awards while not independent per se (they are acting has his employer in this case) the fact that he was asked to be a judge is indicative of his importance in the field. It also gives biographical detail.

There are other solid sources in the article, but those by themselves, are above the WP:N bar IMO ... Hobit (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The PC Gamer article is an in-depth source from a respected source, and combined with other sources is enough to meet the WP:GNG. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.