Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohi (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (nomination withdrawn) AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

Mohi[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Mohi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Show that had its prod removed from a ip, anyway non notable it appears and too soon. Also note-yes this says 2nd nomination but this is in fact the first one, unless if this show was somehow in production in 2006. Wgolf (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: It's too soon, but the article has reliable sources and meets Wikipedia's criteria. 182.69.98.247 (talk) 04:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The show wasn't in development for 9 years. You can also search in Google. The show will premeire in May 2015. 182.68.39.68 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
-Yes I know the show wasn't in production that long-the note is because it says 2nd nomination but the first nomination was for a different topic with this name so its not really the 2nd one. Wgolf (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Sorry nominator... but to say "non notable it appears and too soon" seems a bit presumptive, as multiple sources speak toward this topic,[1] and we DO have sources saying it is to debut sometime this month].[2][3][4] A worry is that it seems this discussion is being negatively colored by "other" discussions. Point here is that the thing already has coverage to meet WP:GNG and is to debut within a few days or weeks. And policy tells us that sourcable future events may be written of "if the event is notable and almost certain to take place". SO.... (and in ignoring the "keeps" from the SPA anon IPs} the question is less about this being TOO SOON and more about shall we delete now and simply recreate the article in a few days when it actually airs? I myself say keep and we can always revisit the topic if the sources prove inaccurate and Star Plus never airs this project. Schmidt, Michael Q. 18:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment-I don't remember what I got when I looked this up but I do remember not getting anything for the show a couple weeks ago. Wgolf (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Schmidt. Article appears to be notable and its almost certainly going to be aired within a matter of weeks, so WP:CRYSTAL does not appear to be an issue. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn-Okay withdrawing this. Wgolf (talk) 04:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.