Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobicure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mobicure[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ORGCRITE, the only coverage I was able to find was either trivial or not independent of the subject. The best coverage I found was [1], a feature on one of the company's products in a publication of unclear reliability. Previously nominated for G11 by Steve Quinn, which was denied, and nominated for PROD by Onel5969, dePROD by the initial editor, who did not provide much in the way of a rationale or changes to the article following dePROD. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I got distracted at work from completing this nomination but was headed here myself. Lacks the sorts of reliable independent secondary sources discussing it in significant detail required by NCORP. Most coverage, both in the article and found in my BEFORE, are either press releases or churnalism based on press releases. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Despite the claims of solving the world's health problems with technology, it seems that this company actually has two apps for health-related social chat. According to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, one of them has been downloaded 2000 times and is used by 500 people. Those are not high numbers. I see no indication that WP:NCORP could be met. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - obviously, since I prodded it. Rosguill's assessment is spot on. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Terrible sourcing and no indication of significant coverage whatsoever. – Ammarpad (talk) 23:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.