Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International Queen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 11:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss International Queen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like advertising based on fake sources The Banner talk 19:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have added some references from CNN Travel, Huffington Post, IBTimes. Much more coverage can be found in Thai national newspaper websites (Bangkok Post, The Nation). I have also deleted the original references which are unrelated to this article. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Most educational and encyclopedic. Thanks to Lerdsuwa for the improvements, much appreciated. — Cirt (talk) 04:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this seems notable, acceptable and sourced. Pinging past users Bearcat, Mabalu, Narutoloveshinata5 and Davey2010. SwisterTwister talk 07:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Speedy close as keep The smell of advertising is still there but at least it is now based on reliable sources (that I did not find) The Banner talk 10:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.