Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International Queen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect all to Miss International Queen. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miss International Queen 2004[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per "no consensus" closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International Queen 2012, what we have here is a batch of articles which break out a beauty pageant by every individual year in which it's been held — but not a single article in the bunch cites even one reliable source to actually support a standalone article (in every last case the only "sources" are the organization's own webpage and its Facebook profile.) The articles, further, frequently contain unverifiable WP:BLP violations like "Bianca Gold, according to rumors in Facebook, she is the mayor trafficant of transgender from Brazil to Denmark and other parts in Europe, this is only a rumor" or "Ruby Bella Cruz got angry before she did not make the Top 10." or, possibly my favourite slice of hell-to-the-no in Wikipedia ever, "Shantell D'Marco from is not virgin anymore. She lost it when she was only 9 years old." We don't need a comprehensive set of unsourced articles about every individual year's pageant — the main parent article (which I'm not proposing that we delete) already contains as much detail as we actually need or can properly source. Either delete all or redirect all to Miss International Queen. No prejudice against recreation in the future if real reliable sources can actually be cited, but the absence of proper sourcing we cannot keep a separate spinout for each individual year (especially ones that contain BLP-flouting assertions about the competitors' virginity — just for the record, it's a transgender beauty pageant, which is why the "lost her virginity at 9" one counts as a bigger BLP violation than the "mayor of transgender" thing.) Bearcat (talk) 04:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all as per my earlier nom in which I said Non-notable running of event. No independent refs. Googling finds no independent refs with in depth coverage. Merge and redirect to Miss International Queen possible to avoid 404'ing links. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all per stuart. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 12:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all as above. Mabalu (talk) 00:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to Miss International Queen. Strangely, I saw a documentary on the pageant on TV just yesterday (Thailand is known for its large number of transgenders), but I believe that none of these events have any individuals notability. Also, the main article needs more sources. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.