Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirco Martins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mirco Martins[edit]

Mirco Martins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe this person is notable. A number of sources are unreliable, including blogs and his own webpage. The CNN "report" clearly states Not verified by CNN making it unreliable Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - To clarify what the nominator is saying - that source is a CNN iReport. This is their foray into citizen journalism. The idea is that if CNN can verify what the iReport says, it is uploaded onto the main CNN website. This iReport hasn't been uploaded. Furthermore, the user who wrote it has only written this one report. This is definitely an unreliable source. I also found that something was cited to a page on the BP website that doesn't mention the subject so I removed that from the article. Yaris678 (talk) 12:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.