Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miquel Reina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Miquel Reina[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, whose debut and sole novel was self published jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:46, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable writer. My sister-in-law who has written a few books and used to be a journalist for the Salt Lake Tribune and is now a free-lancer is closer to being notable, and she is not notable. Her books were not self-published for one thing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a closer look. One novel, self-published - HOWEVER, it was then pickup up by a mainstream publisher, brought out in print, and translated into German, French, and English. Sourcing may exist.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a closer look at the novel in question, Lights on the Sea, and I can only find self-published blog reviews of the book- i.e. not the "significant work" required by WP:NAUTHOR. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, the refs in the article give some indication of notability but it is pretty close to a delete. Szzuk (talk) 15:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not a notable author, WP:TOOSOON. Isingness (talk) 01:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.