Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindy Utay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:18, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mindy Utay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: blatant business promotion masquerading as an article. Quis separabit? 22:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I looked at the refs in the article. The first HuffPost piece is an article by the subject, not about the subject. The Yahoo piece has a passing mention of the subject, in the form of a quote. Woman's Day; likewise a passing reference. The second HuffPost item is a list of articles the subject has written. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: for the same reasons above. I can't find any notability either. Also, the page creator maybe the same user Msrpotus who blogs on [1] and possible therefore an undisclosed paid editor. Although he doesn't appear to make anything other than good edits, it does appear that he is monitoring a small very select range of articles – like what paid editors are paid to do – rather than getting involved in any general WP editing. He also cleans his talk-page of any history - which would look good to prospective clients. Shows competence as not having edits ever challenged. Of-course POTUS also stands for President of the United States and his edits and page creations are mostly about politicians. He is ticking too many boxes. Is this enough suspicion to take this to COIN ? Aspro (talk) 20:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See my note on User Talk:Msrpotus. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. That was quick, straight and to the point! Aspro (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.