Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Ryan (music video producer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Ryan (music video producer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely promotional (though not enough so to qualify for G11), relying almost exclusively on primary sources. Some Googling didn't turn up any obvious secondary coverage, leading me to strongly doubt that he passes notability. Also, as far as I can tell all of the interwiki links are fake, which often is a sign of exaggeration or misrepresentation in an article. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 15:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this hits a week without anyone else commenting, I'd just like to note that I'd rather see it soft-deleted than relisted. Obviously the decision is up to the reviewing admin, but I'd appreciate if this weren't blindly relisted by a non-admin. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 05:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - his main claim to notability seems to be producing videos for Diamond (rapper), but I can't realistically accept his own primary sources to accept a merge into the other article. A search for anything else is make hard by the fact there are several Mike Ryans out there, including a Dr Mike Ryan who specialises in pandemics (ie: the name of this Ryan's label). Fundamentally, while it's not quite G11 material, the puffery is just too strong. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.