Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Gómez Palapa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Gómez Palapa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL // Timothy :: talk 14:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 14:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 14:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 14:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG and searched ofr some sources but nothing about him CreativeNorth (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What about the WP:NFOOTY, per this source currently in the article? --Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 16:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - does meet NFOOTBALL, as shown by this source which is already on the article (click 'Estadística Clubes' and you'll see many appearances listed in the 'Segunda División', which is Ascenso MX and is listed at WP:FPL). Article needs improving, not deleting. If my understanding of Mexican football is wrong please ping me... Giant Snowman 14:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – as per GS. Played in both Liga MX and the Ascenso MX, which are both listed at FPL. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NFOOTY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass any reasonable understanding of the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What about the WP:NFOOTY? An article can fail the GNG and still be notable if it makes a WP:SNG --Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 16:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 13:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep mostly per GiantSnowman. As shown here, the dude played in Liga MX among other leagues, which is listed as a professional league here.--Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 16:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but improve.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article about footballer who played several seasons in a fully-pro league (Liga MX). He played sparingly, and there is very little in-depth Spanish-language coverage available online (the Crónica reference in the article is the only in-depth coverage I can find). Thus, it's a pretty weak keep, but I suspect there is better coverage in offline Spanish-language sources. Jogurney (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - nomination is false, as had 8 appearances in the Primera División de México Clausura 2003 and 2 appearances in the Copa Libertadores - haven't checked other seasons, but easily meets NFOOTY and massive WP:BEFORE failure. Nfitz (talk) 04:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.