Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Migration Policy Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Migration Policy Institute[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROD removed by an IP. This article has never cited any independent sources to establish notability. Guy (Help!) 12:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editors have provided some independent sources below, but to respond to the nomination for deletion, they should be added to the article itself.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per coverage in reliable sources NYTimes, San Diego Tribune, and LA Times. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 16:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:39, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep MacArthur Foundation calls it notable. Good enough for me https://www.macfound.org/grantees/535/ Rogermx (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. WP:NCORP is not as friendly for NGOs as it should be, but its publications and researchers seem widely cited (many cites in books, GNews). Those kind of institutions are about as notable as similarly not-well-covered by GNG middle-level government agencies and such. I lean towards keeping. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Needs independent references, which I will soon supply. Immigration is a hot topic, but we need factual information from academics and think-tanks.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.