Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Titus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Titus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography of unremarkable photographer. Fails WP:GNG. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nomination, this article is full of autobiographical fluff while yielding little information of the notability of the subject. In the absence of any quality, independent documentation, I must conclude that the subject is indeed not notable. TheMindsEye (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know for sure whether this is autobiographical, though the combination of biographical information with lack of sources for this does suggest it. Amid a lot of fluff hinting at notability there's no mention of substantial exhibition or publication, let alone critical commentary. And so, delete. -- Hoary (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The technique is recent, the subject is presumably active currently, so FUTON bias unlikely to be prevalent. No significant third-party references in web, books, or news archives. ^Bongo_matic 06:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.