Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micah Stephen Williams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 15:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Micah Stephen Williams[edit]
- Micah Stephen Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One significant role. Fails WP:ENT. Too soon. SummerPhD (talk) 16:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing reliable on Google to show notability. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - This actor is on the cusp of notability. WP:NACTOR requires "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions", but this actor has only one significant role, and a handful of minor appearances in other shows. Google hits show 99% self promotion/blogs/DB indexes, but very little independent commentary. --Noleander (talk) 00:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of sustainable sources. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.