Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men of the Dawn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Austin Mardon. and redirect. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Men of the Dawn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Darkness Shines (talk) 23:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:32, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~. I wasn't able to find anything to show that this was ultimately notable enough to merit an entry. It's not in very many libraries, it's not used very often (or really at all) as a reference to where it'd pass on that format. There are no reviews or other coverage about it either. Much of what does mention it, mentions it in a "this exists and was printed in this year" type of format. In other words, books that are more of a database of whatever book was published for a specific country and/or genre during a certain country. I'd recommend redirecting this, but given that there are two authors I'm not sure which one I'd redirect to. I do see where there are potential notability problems with both articles, so if one is ever deleted, the other is what it should redirect to. If anyone can find sources that show notability I'm willing to change my mind, as I think that this might be one of those cases where a book might have coverage that isn't on the internet, but I'm leaning towards not given the lack of any true coverage of the book. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect is a good option. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Or merge and redirect to Austin Mardon. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.