Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Jiménez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The keep !vote didn't explain why notability might exist within the meaning of our policies, however, I am willing to usrfy or undelete (w/ proper sourcing) on request. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 00:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Jiménez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:MUSIC: no physical sales; no evidence of notability (or even charting) for download-only single; no WP:RS coverage Closeapple (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the lists of Bands and musicians-related deletions and New York-related deletions. —Closeapple (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence that her only single, "Untouchable", was even released anywhere but on iTunes and her own MySpace page; can't find any evidence it charted on any significant chart. No evidence that (allegedly "new" in 2007 then "due in 2008" then "due in 2009") album Signed Sealed Delivered ever was issued in any form or will be in the forseeable future. Only coverage seems to be non-WP:RS one-paragraph fluff pieces and so-called "interview" promos, most of which seem to blindly claim her "single" is "from her album" that never existed. Also, the few references in the article don't actually verify the claims made. --Closeapple (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I came up empty on any reliable sources to indicate notability, as per WP:MUSIC. No other claim to notability, I think.... Studerby (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cutno (talk) 04:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm sure I will be able to find reliable sources. Chelo61 (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.