Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meher Mount

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Meher Baba. Barkeep49 (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meher Mount[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some commercial entity whose sole mentions in independent reliable sources are over a county daily concerning an old burnt tree springing back to life and a couple of scatter hits over a local radio. ∯WBG^converse 13:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 13:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 13:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While looking over the article, I thought that GEOLAND would apply as a reason to keep. However, this is a commercial entity as WBG describes, and it does not meet the required sources needed for WP:NORG. Utopes (talk) 23:54, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Precisely; I initially thought of GEOLAND but this is purely a commercial entity .... ∯WBG^converse 05:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/ Merge and Redirect to Meher Baba. Fails WP:SIGCOV on its own, but the content would be valuable on the article on Meher Baba.4meter4 (talk) 13:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, probably to Meher Baba, which mentions the place twice already. And the place is all about him. Since there exists an appropriate merge/redirect target, this is what should be done if the place seems non-notable on its own, which seems to be the case. --Doncram (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.