Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazayah Legend Andrews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mazayah Legend Andrews[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonnotable person whos claim to fame is being related to someone notable. Isn't a notable football player or otherwise notable for anything else. CUPIDICAE💕 21:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, found [1] [2] and [3], but I don't know if they are reliable. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 22:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are not rs, they are paid for spam aka blackhat SEO which is why they were removed. CUPIDICAE💕 22:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Does not pass WP:GNG and is not notable simply for the fact they were related to someone. I also wonder if the creator of the page is is independent of the subject. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears to fail GNG. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not pass GNG. Gabe114 (talk) 14:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NGRIDIRON, WP:NCOLLATH, and WP:GNG, per all above. Ejgreen77 (talk) 06:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability is not inherited. There is some promotional sources for his fashion business, but this doesn't rise up to significant coverage.--Mvqr (talk) 11:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Ejgreen77. Cbl62 (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This person is not even remotely close to being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.