Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bielby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. There appear to be sufficient reliable sources interspersed among the "vanity" ones. That notability is limited to the UK is obviously no reason to delete. Xoloz (talk) 15:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Bielby[edit]

Delete nn, sources are basically first party sources, but nothing really distinguishes this gentleman. WP:BIO.Carlossuarez46 04:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Director of a non-notable company; not notable. - Rjd0060 04:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO (and his pic is very annoying). --brew crewer (yada, yada) 08:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable editor in the UK, has launched many magazines Stephenb (Talk) 08:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - most of the publications with which he has been associated have articles and I have even heard of some of them, eg PC Gamer. He seems to have been a prolific editor, admittedly in a minority market. -- roundhouse0 10:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is notable in the UK publishing field. The article does need rewriting, but it isn't right to go straight to trying to delete it. Alberon 16:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article establishes his notability adequately. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 22:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.