Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark E. Fidelman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Ged UK 16:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mark E. Fidelman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CEO of several social media companies, and a blogger for Forbes, but no real signs of notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article author has been confirmed as a sockpuppet of a permanently blocked user, making WP:CSD#G5 applicable in this case. Article has been so marked. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:13, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:14, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - article created by a sock in circumvention of a block. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 05:00, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Ignore editor behavior and looking at the content on its own merits. In this case it does not pass WP:GNG. The Forbes link is material by the subject, not about the subject. The Huffington Post link is a hint of notability but not sufficient on its own, need more sources that discuss about the subject in depth. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.