Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Burnett (producer) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein is that the subject does not meet any of the various notability guidelines at this time to qualify for an article. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Burnett (producer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. Subject's participation in Dr. Who was uncredited and he has only one movie to his credit, which does not satisfy the notability guidelines. Article previously deleted at AfD for notability reasons and absolutely no indication the subject has achieved notability since the last AfD. Safiel (talk) 17:50, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note. In hope of avoiding confusion noted in the previous AfD, please note that this Mark Burnett is not the same person as Mark Burnett, the prominent American producer of Survivor who is CEO of United Artists and the husband and business partner of Roma Downey . --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can list dozens of people who have articles that contain only a few sentences and no other references than IMDB that have been kept on Wikipedia. I added the page for others to contribute their knowledge to the article as Wikipedia is meant to be. Others may know more about this person and be able to contribute more.Makro (talk) 23:49, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This person's only claim to notability is producing a film called "Sleeper", which if IMDb is to be believed, was made on a budget of just £10,000, and received no critical attention whatsoever. The film isn't notable, and therefore, its producer can't possibly be. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just because a film has a low budget doesn't make it less notable. Paranormal Activity had a budget of $15,000. I am aware that this film was heavily promoted, I just thought id point that out.Makro (talk) 13:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid rationale and we don't keep articles only so they can serve to collect other tidbits. I'd recommend keeping entries in sandboxes and soliciting help with them. Wikipedia has to have quality control. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:54, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have heard of him and have been trying to find sources of info online. Just because a few people like User:Safiel dont know of him doesnt mean there isnt someone on here who does. The page shoukd stay so thry have to opportunity to improve it. 193.111.141.66 (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC) — 193.111.141.66 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Comment I smell the distinct odor of dirty socks in the air. Safiel (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- A comment to the comment - I notice that there was significant sock puppetry during the last AfD, so let us hope that this will not happen this time around. Tomas e (talk) 13:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't appear to meet GNG and CREATIVE, and I have the strong suspicion that the article creator's spree of nominating articles for deletion under the same grounds may well be rather WP:POINTy. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and subject fails WP:CREATIVE. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Cullen 328 and Kudpung. Tomas e (talk) 12:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -Subject fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and each and every other notability guideline. I also noticed that the creator of the page is making multiple bad-faith nominations as such this one, should they not take this personally and familiarize themselves with relevant Wikipedia's policy and guidelines. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Becky Sayles (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - wish him luck in his future, but way WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:CREATIVE--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.