Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Olărașu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Olărașu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reopened AfD individually from a squib bundled AfD. For this individual, WP:BEFORE shows passing mention in an article titled "Moldovan president congratulates medalists ..." and some athlete statistics but nothing that would satisfy WP:NOTNEWS substantively. No major medals attained as far as can be seen on stats sites, which would qualify under NATHLETE; merely participating in games does not qualify. I believe search on Romanian language (Latin) text on the Moldavan name as written in the article is sufficient (i.e. not Cyrillic). ☆ Bri (talk) 18:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Moldova. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 18:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per my arguments at Daniela Cociu (her rowing partner). Same search results.

JoelleJay (talk) 23:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no GNG sources presented. (t · c) buidhe 07:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:ForsythiaJo seems to have added a bunch of promising-looking references; has anyone analyzed those yet? BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They are all the same passing mentions, brief announcements, and routine event recaps I found in my own search. Nothing approaching SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 22:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom/above. BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Sources found are all routine mill news, name mentions, listings, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 01:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.