Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manyang Mayom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments for this article's inclusion have been made. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manyang Mayom[edit]

Manyang Mayom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically a CV for a non-notable person Horstvonludwig (talk) 11:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I moved this from the article talk page. ansh666 17:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and I myself frankly planned to PROD but had not yet in case it was removed, there's simply still nothing at all convincing for establishing his notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Poorly written article ("Mayom is most popular and strong influential") which fails to establish subject's notability. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 04:27, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.