Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manos Krystalis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:23, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Manos Krystalis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about non-notable actor and model. AFC declined, but the creator moved it to article space anyway. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User-Reyezsj: "I contest the charge that the artist is 'non-notable.' Please explain to me the grounds on which non-notability is categorized. Here are some sources to indicate the status of the actor (who is also a singer):

http://www.infactor.com/el/talent/1373 http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2357821/ http://www.modelmayhem.com/1166935. http://www.amazon.com/Manos-Krystalis-Covers/dp/B003WR9QBM

I was in the process of editing the article when it was moved." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reyezsj (talk • contribs) 23:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the cited references indicate that this person exists, is a model, and has recorded. Not that he is notable. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 23:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What needs to be Included to prove that he is notable?

The guidelines are pretty clear: evidence of significant coverage in independent sources. Articles written about Krystalis, not just mentioning his name in passing. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 02:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable. Refs listed are not reliable sources. Declined AfC is also telling, in that the proposed article was reviewed by an experienced editor and deemed not encyclopedic. GregJackP Boomer! 03:17, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. The cited sources include such things as his own web site, IMDb, and a model agency, none of which does anything at all to establish notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:42, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.