Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manicaland Development Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manicaland Development Association[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage seems not to be significant enough per GNG. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 21:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Africa, and Zimbabwe. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 21:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: while Manicaland is notable, this is not and has no information about it. There would need to be some sort of important secondary coverage of impact or consequences. Chamaemelum (talk) 04:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.