Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malangano Ga Sambano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bible translations into the languages of Africa. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Malangano Ga Sambano[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe we have criteria for the notability of bible translations. This translation is for a rare language in Africa; no references or notes are given to establish notability of the publication so it fails to meet WP:NBOOKS. Mikeblas (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Bible translations into the languages of Africa, which is a list by language and has no entry for this one. PamD 16:04, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Question. The material in this article is only a single sentence, yet it is completely unreferenced. Is it worthwhile to merge unreferenced material? -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect per mikeblas - unless someone will find some detail on the circumstances of the translation or other useful material to make this more than a stub. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.