Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Roller Hockey Pro Division

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Major League Roller Hockey Pro Division[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Was a major professional league in the sport of roller hockey. -DJSasso (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a league. It is a division within a league. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was a league, it was setup as a pyramid like European sports. They were each separate leagues under one league banner. Admittedly the terminology is confusing. -DJSasso (talk) 16:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or very limited merge to Major League Roller Hockey if any of this can be referenced. This is mostly insufficiently notable sportscruft. It may deserve a short paragraph in the main article but not an article of its own. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 18:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:52, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What was the justification for relisting this for a 3rd time? Exemplo347 (talk) 09:28, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nominator is being completely disruptive with all these AfDs. WP:SPORTCRIT only applies to players. Please stop. You are being completely disruptive and need to knock it off. Smartyllama (talk) 14:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Agree with DanielRigal. Does not deserve an article of its own as this is mostly not notable sportscruft. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.